With its ruling on Tuesday, a federal appeals court lifted a four-year hold on the first state law of its kind, allowing Arkansas’ restriction on gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth to go into full force.
In 2021, the contentious restriction was approved by a supermajority Republican Legislature in Arkansas, making it the first state to outlaw hormone therapy and puberty blockers for individuals under the age of 18. Despite an unexpected veto from then-Governor Asa Hutchinson, a conservative who claimed the measure was well-meaning but misguided and allowed the state to overrule patients, parents, and medical professionals, lawmakers managed to pass it into law.
Quick action was taken by those opposed to the ban to obtain an injunction that prevented the law from going into force while the courts determined whether it was constitutional.
Four transgender Arkansas youths and their families sued the state over the prohibition, and U.S. District Judge James Moody ruled in June 2023 that it wasn’t.By denying certain young people access to procedures that were permitted for others, Moody’s found that the law infringed against the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. For example, the Arkansas law permitted the continued use of puberty blockers to delay children’s early onset of puberty, but it forbade transgender youth from using them to prevent bodily changes that were inconsistent with their gender identification. Additionally, Moody determined that the statute in Arkansas prohibited doctors from even talking to their patients about gender-affirming therapy, which was a violation of the First Amendment.
However, Moody’s verdict was appealed by the state of Arkansas. Furthermore, Tuesday’s news was not particularly surprising due to a recent court decision and an increasingly conservative federal court system.Tennessee’s equivalent ban on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in June. There was a 6-3 ideological division among the justices.
Unusually, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals heard Arkansas’ appeal en banc, which means that instead of a three-judge panel, the whole court considered the matter. Judge Duane Benton wrote the majority opinion, which was signed by eight of the court’s eleven judges. James Loken and Jane Kelly, two judges, partially dissented. (An 8th Circuit judge, Bobby Shepherd of El Dorado, who is the father of former state House Speaker Matthew Shepherd, declined to participate in the case.)
Judge Kelly’s opinion encapsulated the dangers of denying adolescents access to care that is gender affirming:
The case’s undeniable factual facts demonstrate that Act 626 completely eliminates the only viable treatment for teenagers with a documented, serious illness. The results also demonstrate that, because Arkansas refuses to provide gender-affirming care, at least some of the children whose health is used as justification for this law are at danger of experiencing escalating anxiety, depression, hospitalization, and suicidality, meaning that [n]ot all… will survive to age 18. At 909, Brandt, 677 F. Supp. 3d. Regardless of the method or associated hazards, the Act forbids this therapy indiscriminately. Furthermore, even though hormone therapy and puberty blockers have the same or greater dangers when used for other diseases, the Act solely forbids their use in the treatment of gender dysphoria. Furthermore, the district court concluded that there was no proof of any children in Arkansas regretting or experiencing any other particular harm as a result of the medication that the state’s doctors had ordered. This evidence suggests, in my opinion, that the Act represents only unfounded fear or unfavorable views, specifically a moral panic regarding juvenile gender dysphoria.
A press conference Legislative sponsors of the 2021 ban were summoned to the microphone for a victory lap by Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin on Tuesday afternoon.
Children’s penises and breasts are not amputated, according toElm Springs Republican Rep. Robin Lundstrum stated. A youngster is not chemically castrated by us.
During the 2021 debate of the bill at the state capitol, it was usual to hear false and misleading exaggeration like this, which implied that doctors in Arkansas were conducting scientific experiments on children. In actuality, children’ sex organs were not being medically removed by Arkansas doctors. In order to help transgender adolescents better match their bodies with their gender identification, some doctors in Arkansas were giving them cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers. Even as their anti-trans campaign pushed beleaguered LGBT adolescents into psychiatric misery, allegations that these surgeries were taking place within state boundaries inspired culture warriors to defend the children.
Co-sponsor of the 2021 bill, State Senator Alan Clark (R-Lonsdale), stated on Tuesday that real gender dysphoria is often a masculine condition that is very uncommon in children under the age of two, and the cause is unknown. According to Clark, the majority of those two-year-olds outgrow their gender confusion. According to Clark, young people who struggle with their gender identity just need to do some psychological treatment because they don’t know what they desire on a daily basis.
Major medical organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, doctors, and psychiatrists challenged Arkansas’s ban on gender-affirming care for children. AG Griffin, however, stated on Tuesday that elected leaders frequently disregard the medical community’s knowledge.
We frequently advise healthcare providers on how to address problems. He stated that this is not any different.
The law in Arkansas does more than merely outline what physicians are permitted to perform. What they can say is likewise governed by the law. Doctors are no longer allowed to talk to young patients about gender-affirming therapy or recommend that they seek treatment in places where it is still lawful.
The issue of whether this ban is unconstitutional under the First Amendment was dismissed by Griffin.
“You’re breaking the law if you’re telling a child or suggesting that they seek this kind of care,” he warned.
A news release was issued Tuesday by the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, which spearheaded the legal challenge to the prohibition that lasted for years.”This fight is not over,” said Executive Director Holly Dickson, who referred to the ruling as profoundly unjust.
Here is the complete ACLU release:
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed a challenge to an Arkansas law that prohibits gender-affirming care for transgender adolescents in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti. In 2021, the Arkansas bill overcame Governor Asa Hutchinson’s veto to become the first statewide prohibition on gender-affirming care.
For transgender Arkansans, their physicians, and their families, this is a painfully unfair outcome, according to Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas.The state has tried and failed to demonstrate that this law benefits children; in reality, it is a harmful statute that puts children at risk. Families in Arkansas have already been greatly impacted by the law, as everyone has the fundamental right to act in their children’s best interests. We want transgender Arkansans to know they are not alone while we and our clients think about what to do next. We are committed to ensuring that they have equitable access to the health care they require, safety, and dignity.
The restriction, which would have prohibited medical professionals from providing medically essential healthcare to transgender adolescents under the age of 18, was challenged shortly after it was passed in 2021 by two doctors and four families of transgender youth. The lawsuit claimed that House Bill 1570 violates the U.S. Constitution and was filed in federal court. Since July 2021, the District Court’s preliminary injunction had prevented the law’s enforcement. For more than 4 years, the law has been blocked.
The ACLU of Arkansas, the law firms of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Gill Ragon Owen, as well as the ACLU’s Jon L. Stryker and Slobodan Randjelovi LGBTQ & HIV Project, are providing legal representation to the families and their doctor.
It’s dragon-slaying time!
The Arkansas Times, which relentlessly defends the fundamental rights and liberties in our community, stands as a light of truth in an era when critical voices are being silenced more and more. Our commitment to provide uncompromising journalism has never been more important, especially with Arkansas in the center of a broad culture war that is impacting our libraries, schools, and public conversation. We can’t accomplish our goals of defeating dragons and holding those in positions of authority responsible alone. You can guarantee that independent journalism in Arkansas not only endures but flourishes by making a contribution today. We can join the fight and make a difference together.
